免責事項: 本サイトは、FDA、ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed、SEC EDGAR などの公式公開データを一般参考用に集約するものであり、医学的助言、診断、治療推奨、投資助言を構成しません。

臨床試験

STEP: Proglide® Versus Femoseal®: A Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Arterial Closure Devices Following Endovascular Peripheral Arterial Procedures

NCT: NCT03192033 · COMPLETED

NCT識別子NCT03192033
ステータスCOMPLETED
開始日2017-12-04
完了2019-06-25
SponsorNantes University Hospital (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

概要

Over the past years, arterial closure systems have tended to replace manual compression to ensure hemostasis at femoral artery puncture points. Arterial closure systems reduce hemostasis and patient immobilization times, thus enabling early resumption of walking. These devices have contributed extensively to the development of outpatient stays for cardiology, vascular and neuro-radiology procedures. However, main arterial closure devices use different technology to close the arterial puncture point. For some, hemostasis is achieved by sealing the arteriotomy between two discs (an inner and an outer). For others, they are designed to close puncture sites delivering a single monofilament polypropylene suture mediated by needles. The investigators hypothesis is based on a different efficacy between both arterial closure devices for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients.

公式ソース

ClinicalTrials.govで見る →

データはClinicalTrials.gov APIから取得しています。最新のステータスは公式記録をご確認ください。

↑