免責事項: 本サイトは、FDA、ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed、SEC EDGAR などの公式公開データを一般参考用に集約するものであり、医学的助言、診断、治療推奨、投資助言を構成しません。

臨床試験

CPAP vs High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Treating Sleep Apnea in Children

NCT: NCT07600333 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT識別子NCT07600333
ステータスNOT_YET_RECRUITING
開始日2026-06-01
SponsorThe Hospital for Sick Children (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

概要

This study is looking at two different treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. OSA is a sleep condition where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, which can affect a child's health, behavior, learning, and quality of life. Children with moderate-to-severe OSA who cannot be treated with surgery are often prescribed Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). CPAP uses a mask worn during sleep to deliver pressurized air and keep the airway open. Although CPAP is effective, many children have difficulty using it regularly because it can feel uncomfortable or hard to tolerate. This study compares CPAP with another treatment called High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC). HFNC delivers warm, humidified air through soft nasal prongs and may be more comfortable and easier for children to use while still helping keep the airway open during sleep. Children aged 2 to 18 years with moderate-to-severe OSA will be randomly assigned to use either CPAP or HFNC at home during sleep for 3 months. The study will measure how much each treatment is used, how well it improves sleep-related symptoms and quality of life, how comfortable it is for children, and how it affects caregivers. The goal of this study is to find out whether HFNC is a comfortable and effective alternative to CPAP for treating obstructive sleep apnea in children.

公式ソース

ClinicalTrials.govで見る →

データはClinicalTrials.gov APIから取得しています。最新のステータスは公式記録をご確認ください。

↑