Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction
NCT: NCT05774236 · COMPLETED
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare how two methods for cervical ripening work in a population of singleton pregnancies with late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) at term. The main question it aims to answer is whether Cook´s balloon (a mechanical method) is superior to vaginal dinoprostone (a pharmacological method) in achieving a vaginal delivery. Participants will be randomized to receive Cook´s balloon (experimental group) or vaginal dinoprostone (control group) for cervical ripening. Researchers will compare both groups to see if Cook´s balloon is associated with a higher rate of vaginal delivery than vaginal dinoprostone. Neonatal outcomes (including neonatal acidosis, the MAIN morbidity score, and NICU admission) will be assessed as secondary, descriptive endpoints.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction?
Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction is a clinical trial registered under NCT05774236. Current status: COMPLETED.
What is the status of NCT05774236?
The current status of NCT05774236 (Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction) is: COMPLETED.
When did Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction start?
Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction started on 2023-03-27.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.