Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion

NCT: NCT07726784 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07726784
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-09-01
Completion2028-06-01
SponsorNational University of Malaysia (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Pleural effusion is a common problem in hospital patients. It may arise from a wide range of diseases. There is a multitude of recognised causes of pleural effusion, and in addition, other pleural conditions such as pleural thickening and pneumothorax represent a significant burden to the healthcare system and to patients. However, the diagnosis of this condition may sometimes be difficult. In pleural effusions undiagnosed by thoracocentesis, closed pleural biopsy provides limited yield, whereas the diagnostic yield of thoracoscopy is substantially higher for both malignant and tuberculous pleural effusions. Hence, medical thoracoscopy (MT) (pleuroscopy) is the gold standard in the diagnosis of pleural effusion and it is indicated when less invasive tests have failed. MT is a procedure in which the pleura is directly and visually examined. An endoscope is inserted into the intercostal space by creating a pneumothorax with an incision through the chest wall. The pleural space and its lining can be inspected and therapeutic interventions performed. There are two different techniques that can be performed for diagnostic and therapeutic thoracoscopy. One method recommends a single-entry site, the use of a rigid thoracoscope (or of a semi-rigid/semi-flexible pleuroscope) with a working channel for accessory instruments and an optical biopsy forceps, both performed under local anaesthesia. The other method requires two entry sites: one for a trocar for the examination telescope, and the second for accessory instruments including the biopsy forceps, and is usually performed with conscious sedation or general anaesthesia. In the trained hands of a pulmonologist, MT is a safe and effective procedure for diagnosing and treating multiple pleural diseases. The unfamiliarity of the pulmonary physician with rigid instruments and familiarity with the flexible bronchoscope has led various investigators to attempt thoracoscopy with flexible endoscopes. Flexible instruments allow concurrent suctioning to maintain a clear optical field, providing good views at the apex and paravertebral gutters. This method is considered useful for physicians with experience in chest drainage and flexible bronchoscopy, as well as safe and well tolerated with a minimal degree of discomfort and expense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion?

Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion is a clinical trial registered under NCT07726784. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07726784?

The current status of NCT07726784 (Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion start?

Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion started on 2026-09-01.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.