Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Hinge vs CCK Implants

NCT: NCT07818343 · RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07818343
StatusRECRUITING
Start Date2026-02-01
Completion2037-01
SponsorMedstar Health Research Institute (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare reoperation rates for rotating hinge knee implants versus condylar constrained knee implants when used in revision total knee arthroplasty. The secondary purposes are to compare patient satisfaction, loosening rates and clinical outcomes for RHK implants compared to CCK implants in rTKA. Additionally, knee range of motion and stability will be assessed and compared at all follow-up time points. We hypothesize that RHK implants provide patients undergoing rTKA with similar reoperation rates to those of patients who receive a CCK implant. The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive an RHK implant will have similar loosening rates and clinical outcomes compared to patients who receive a CCK implant. Lastly, knee stability and patient satisfaction may improve with the use of a rotating hinge device.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hinge vs CCK Implants?

Hinge vs CCK Implants is a clinical trial registered under NCT07818343. Current status: RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07818343?

The current status of NCT07818343 (Hinge vs CCK Implants) is: RECRUITING.

When did Hinge vs CCK Implants start?

Hinge vs CCK Implants started on 2026-02-01.

Related Devices

K240043EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System;GUARDIAN™ limb Salvage System;DCW Modular Distal Femoral System;REPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System;EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System; EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System; EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert; EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert; EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS and PS Inserts; EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System; ADVANCE® Double High Insert; ADVANCE® A-CLASS® Tibial Insert; ADVANCE® Knee System; ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial InseMicroport Orthopedics, Inc. K241000ATTUNE™ Revision Knee System; DePuy Knee Prosthesis System Universal Stem Extensions and Universal Femoral Metaphyseal Sleeves; DePuy Sigma PS Femoral Components; DePuy Sigma Cruciate Retaining (C/R) Porocoat Femoral Components; S-ROM™ NOILES™ Rotating Hinge Knee System; DePuy P.F.C. ™ SIGMA™ Total Knee System; DePuy SIGMA™ Total Knee System;Depuy Ireland UC K180317EVOLUTION® Knee Systems – MR Labeling, EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System, EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System, EVOLUTION® Revision CCK SystemMicroport Orthopedics, Inc. K222056Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System, Modular Rotating Hinge KneeHowmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics K223069Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Systems and Compatible ComponentsHowmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑